200 ensimmäistä riviä.
King Arthur.
A noble warrior, who embodied honor and chivalry,
wielded the legendary blade Excalibur
and went on epic quests with the Knights of the Round Table.
For more than a thousand years,
tales have been told about a peasant boy
who pulled a sword out of a stone and became a king.
Is the legend of King Arthur and the Knights
of the Round Table just a myth?
Or is it possible that the story we all know was based on fact?
Was King Arthur a real person?
Well, that is what we’ll try and find out.
Every year, thousands of people gather at
the Gulf Coast Renaissance Faire
to experience a taste of medieval life.
The fair is one of many similar events held around the globe
that are inspired by age-old tales
of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.
I don’t know what child, growing up, doesn’t want
to be a knight in shining armor.
It’s such a romanticized time period that the stories of
King Arthur and Knights of the Round Table and all of their
quests and adventures have branched and become
bigger and bigger right through today’s modern age.
It has such a collective
grab on our imagination and our soul.
King Arthur is everywhere today.
You’d be hard-pressed to find another legendary figure that is
as popular all over the world, in so many times
and so many places, whether it’s in the 12th century,
or the 15th century, or the 21st century.
Since the Middle Ages, the legend of King Arthur
has captured the imagination of countless people
all over the world.
But what are the origins of this powerful story?
The Arthur story begins with a boy raised by farmers.
One time, his brother is in a sword-fighting contest,
and his brother’s sword breaks.
And Arthur said, "No, don’t forfeit, hold off for a second.
I saw a sword."
And he saw a sword stuck in a stone.
As the story goes, the sword that Arthur saw
was no ordinary blade.
It had been prophesied that only the future king of England
could draw the sword out of the stone.
Many men had tried to remove it, but all of them failed.
That is, until Arthur pulled the sword,
and it slid out of the stone.
This is the earliest that Arthur begins to understand that
something is happening in his life beyond his grasp.
Gradually, this unusual young man
does become king of all Britain.
The Arthurian legend basically tells about
a young person who discovers their destiny,
and discovers how to achieve this destiny.
He becomes the center of these medieval romances,
where he is the quintessential leader.
He is Rex Quondom, Rexque Futurus;
the Once and Future King.
It’s amazing how much of that story
has permeated our culture just sort of by osmosis.
And the image we all have is that King Arthur
lives in Camelot, which is a big stone castle.
He had a wife, Guinevere, and also he is assisted
by a wizard named Merlin.
His knights of the Round Table looked for the Holy Grail.
And he has a fabulous sword named Excalibur.
It is this wonderful repository
of symbols and themes and adventures
that are all interlinked,
because they all relate to the court
of this one marvelous figure.
The vast influence of the Arthurian legend
is undeniable.
But for more than 1,000 years,
a fascinating question has lingered.
Is it possible that King Arthur wasn’t merely a myth
but rather a real man?
If we go back to the original accounts of King Arthur,
written during the Dark Ages, around about 500 AD,
the Roman Empire collapsed, and the Roman soldiers
withdrew from Britain.
And this country turned into complete anarchy.
There were various separate tribes fighting each other.
And what was needed was one single warrior
or chieftain or king to unite them all.
And Arthur is said to have been that person in myth and legend.
There are lots of theories on who King Arthur
might really have been.
And really, there’s no clear answer.
The Arthur that we think we know came from
many hands, many authors, many writers,
who had slightly different takes on the Arthur story.
We know the basic elements of the story,
but the man himself remains a mystery.
According to historians, there are numerous versions of
the King Arthur legend, many of which have been lost to time.
But the most influential telling of the story
dates to the 12th century,
when a Welsh monk named Geoffrey of Monmouth
claimed he’d discovered a long-lost account of early
British history that recorded King Arthur
as being an actual person who lived around the year 500 AD.
Monmouth then published a translated version of this text,
which he called The History of the Kings of Britain.
Geoffrey of Monmouth, in his text in the 12th century,
this is what breaks the Arthurian legend wide open.
What’s fascinating is that so many of the things
and places and events he writes about in recent times
have been proven to be correct in terms of
being the right time, the right place,
and the right elements to be based on,
many historians believe, real events.
Could it be possible that the tales
of King Arthur are more than mere fantasy?
Perhaps a clue may be found by examining a castle
in southwest England that Geoffrey of Monmouth claimed
to have been the site where King Arthur was born.
Overlooking the rocky cliffs of
Bristol Channel are the ruins of Tintagel Castle.
Built in the 13th century, this once-mighty fortress
is now a popular tourist attraction
with a fascinating history.
Well, Tintagel is a really wondrous and mysterious location
because it hides an enormous amount of
knowledge about our past.
There’s this fantastic castle that is 900 years old.
But below the ground, there’s tons of information
about hundreds of years before this,
in the period when, perhaps, Arthur existed.
What’s really fantastic and incredible
about this spot in particular is that
Geoffrey of Monmouth tells us
that Arthur’s born in Tintagel, and that has now been
very conclusively proven to have very, very strong links.
Excavations beneath Tintagel have revealed the remains of
an earlier castle that dated back to the sixth century AD.
And a curious inscription found among the prior castle’s remains
offers evidence in support of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s claim
that the real King Arthur
had a profound connection to Tintagel.
In 1998, Glasgow University were excavating here,
and they found a drain cover behind one of the buildings.
And that drain cover... They were amazed to find
it had an inscription on it.
At the top of the stone is very clearly Artognou.
A-R-T-O-G-N-O-U.
It was securely dated to the sixth century, based on
the items around it,
and on that stone
was carved a name that looks
very much like "Arthur." "Artognou."
When you have the site of Tintagel
that has been associated with
Arthur’s supposed birthplace for centuries,
and the discovery of a stone
that has a name on it that begins A-R-T,
you have all the elements
coming together at the right time in the right place.
The mere possibility that one day we’ll be able to verify
the birthplace of the real King Arthur is thrilling.
But could there be other parts of the legend
that might also be historically accurate?
Well, perhaps the answer can be found by examining
two of the most iconic elements of Arthurian lore:
Merlin the Magician and Excalibur.
One of the most iconic stories
from the tales of King Arthur
is that of a young Arthur singlehandedly
pulling a sword out of a stone.
It was a feat that revealed him
to be the one true king of Britain.
But there’s another sword in the Arthur legend
that is no less compelling.
There are two swords in the Arthur story.
One comes out of that stone, and later,
he gets a sword as a gift from the Lady of the Lake.
This is the goddess of the lake.
And her arm comes up out of the water holding a sword.
And that is Excalibur, a sword beyond other swords.
Excalibur, we are told, had a golden hilt,
and had magical powers.
It’s a sword that’s supposed to make Arthur invincible.
Arthur’s story is the hero’s journey,
because it has the magic and the sacred
and all the mystical dimensions.
In the hero’s journey,
the protagonist gains a special tool or weapon.
This is the magical thing.
It will be just the thing you needed,
although you might not know it at the time.
And then the moment will arise and you see
exactly why you have it.
According to legend, King Arthur used Excalibur
to win many battles and unite Britain under his leadership.
But, alas, Arthur finally died on the battlefield
when he was mortally wounded by his son, Mordred.
As King Arthur lies dying on the field of battle...
he asks that his sword, Excalibur,
the source of all his power,
No comments yet. Be the first to leave one.