Lookout (파수꾼)

I swear that...

in this Confirmation Hearing...

held by the National Assembly, as a witness...

I'll tell the truth without adding or omitting anything...

according to my conscience.

If I lie, I accept...

the punishment of perjury.

You are currently working at the Seoul Prosecutor's Office, right?

Yes, I am.

And Chief Prosecutor Yoon is your boss?

Yes, he is.

Then why are you testifying...

against him?

This will affect you negatively professionally.

I did things I shouldn't have done as a prosecutor...

on Chief Prosecutor Yoon's orders.

It was against the law and my conscience,

and I want to make it right again.

What did you do?

I was involved in the Miseo-dong case,

the missing housewife case,

and Yu Na's case.

These are all cases...

that happened in the past but have been reexamined.

How are these cases related?

These are all cases that were closely connected to...

Chief Prosecutor Yoon.

And he has ordered me to intervene illegally...

in these cases.

Can you be more specific?

To start with, in the case of the Miseo-dong case,

the prosecution could easily arrest the real culprit.

He had let the American accomplice leave Korea...

to hinder the investigation.

And recently, even after finding the real culprit...

after five years, he ordered the culprit's...

personal protection so as to stop the investigation.

Why do you think he gave such orders?

I think it was because of the presidential election.

He would've been worried that the ruling party's candidate would be...

negatively affected if there were problems regarding the US army.

There's going to be a presidential election soon.

And the opposing parties have different ideas...

on national security policies.

It might seem...

as if we're favoring one side over another.

I'll be careful.

Did you take measures to forbid him from leaving the country yet?

No, not yet.

Are you trying to say that he was loyal to people with power...

and that as a result, he intervened in politics?

Is that what you mean?

I'm sorry to say...

that I have reason to belief that is the truth.

Commissioner,

we would like to request a witness.

It's former prosecutor of Seoul Prosecutor's Office, Oh Kwang Ho.

Did you hear the testimony of Prosecutor Jang?

Yes, I heard it in the waiting room.

What did you think?

What he said...

is not the truth.

As far as I know, he has done...

nothing wrong as a prosecutor.

To accuse him of having intervened in politics...

is not reasonable. It's simply rude.

Furthermore, I was the prosecutor in charge of the Miseo-dong case...

five years ago.

I know more than he does.

Chief Prosecutor Yoon was the Chief of the Branch Office then,

but he never pressured us regarding such cases.

And I'd like to apologize...

to the victims and their families...

for not having arrested the culprit earlier.

I'm sorry.

He's still lying. That's not a proper apology.

Prosecutor Jang,

how do you know Detective Nam?

I worked with him...

at the Joint Investigation Team created to catch Jo Soo Ji.

That's what it seems like on the outside.

But according to your information,

you did something in secret...

for Chief Prosecutor Yoon. Can you tell me what it was?

Chief Prosecutor Yoon ordered Detective Nam...

to kill Jo Soo Ji...

instead of arresting her.

I was also a part of it.

That is absurd.

To him who was about to be appointed as the attorney general,

Soo Ji was nothing but a nuisance.

She kept on going after the chief prosecutor's past.

As someone on the internet have suggested,

the real culprits of Kim Woo Sung and...

Miseo-dong murder case was found out by her.

That's why he had to kill her.

She became a hindrance to him becoming the attorney general.

Yes, okay. Thank you for your thoughts.

But Prosecutor Jang,

you just made such serious claims. I'm sure you have...

evidence to back up your claims.

No.

All I have is me and my memory,

as someone who has faithfully carried out all of his deeds.

As a prosecutor, how can you entice the people...

and the National Assembly with just an absurd testimony...

without any evidence to back up those claims?

Everything that has to do...

with the chief prosecutor always ends without any evidence.

It's all thanks to people like Detective Nam,

who killed a witness...

named Lee Eun Ja of Lee Shin Hyuk's case.

Are you saying Candidate Yoon...

instigated her murder through Detective Nam?

Yes.

And when he got arrested while throwing her body away,

the chief prosecutor was afraid he would come out into the open,

so he threatened Detective Nam with his son and wife as hostages.

You haven't heard...

from your family for a few days, right?

Your wife is...

getting investigated for bribery charges.

He made Detective Nam commit a suicide for his family.

Detective Nam is...

nothing but a corrupt detective who killed himself...

because he was afraid his corruption will be disclosed.

I did receive his call for help,

but I told him to stick to the law. This has nothing to do with me.

My heart was broken with his death,

but regardless of that, I know his corrupt deeds are...

still getting investigated thoroughly.

Commissioner.

Please remind the candidate he can be charged with perjury...

for lying during a hearing.

Not only that, all of his comments were...

something for him to be criminally liable for.

Candidate Yoon, Prosecutor Jang.

Are you sure you are both telling nothing but the truth?

Yes, you are correct.

Yes.

Then...

why is Soo Ji after his allegedly corrupt cases...

despite the fact that she is currently a runaway?

Like she claims,

was the death of her daughter not an accident?

Yes.

She did lose her daughter to the chief prosecutor's son,

Yoon Si Wan.

Are you saying Si Wan murdered her?

Yes.

And the chief prosecutor...

told me to cover up the case without causing any trouble.

And I followed his order.

That was a case without any evidence.

The case was not indicted.

I am personally very disappointed...

in Prosecutor Jang and Assemblywoman Chae...

for even bringing up...

my minor son's real name...

to spread false information about me.

Prosecutor Jang and Assemblywoman Chae.

You are sitting in a hearing.

Many people are watching us.

This is a very important occasion.

Do you think it's right to falsely accuse someone...

with these cases which have no evidence left?

Commissioner.

And all persons of the National Assembly.

I have never used my power to fulfill...

my selfish interests.

I have always...

stayed faithful as I fully devoted myself...

to this nation and its people.

Like these two people's claims,

if I have done anything that is beyond all reasons...

to covet this position as an attorney general,

or if any evidence of these claims are found,

I will back out from this hearing right this instant.

But for now,

their claim is nothing but a conspiracy about my past...

which has no evidence...

or any direct witnesses.

May 5, 2016.

Si Wan took...

Detective Jo's daughter, Jo Yu Na...

to a rooftop, and I witnessed the incident with my own eyes.

(Jang Do Han Witnessed Candidate Yoon's Son)

What did he just say?

He was at the scene when Si Wan took...

Yu Na to the rooftop.

Do you understand what your claim means?

If you were at the scene,

that also means you're guilty of aiding his murder.

Do you acknowledge that fact?

Do you acknowledge that...

you abetted his murder?

Yes.

I could have...

stopped Si Wan from committing a murder.

I could have stopped Yu Na from dying.