처음 200줄입니다.
- And I said, "What does painting mean to you?"
And he said, "Painting is the most intimate act of war."
- Many of my friends were in the military.
I had joined from Holland and was sent,
almost immediately, to basic training in March
to report to Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri,
and then immediately was sent to Iraq,
Saudi Arabia after that.
So I had very little time to sort of adjust.
I was there, from there I went to Fort Bragg,
and with Fort Bragg we went directly,
were sent directly over directly
'cause the conflict had already started.
- I think, of course, his military past,
you very often see in almost all of his paintings,
especially in the urban paintings,
but also in the Faceless Series.
He's a very serious person.
As I said, a very caring person.
He is very interested
in today's
political, economic, environmental subjects
and that, in my opinion, you see in all his works.
I saw the damage that we did.
Those are things that you don't forget
and I'm sure,
well, I'm not sure, but I don't know
how much my military experience
or what I experienced there, or even afterwards,
influenced my work now, but I'm certain
that it had some kind of impact on me.
There was a sense of hyper-alertness
that happened during that time.
When you're in an environment that's dangerous,
there's an automatic hyper-alertness
that you're in instinctive mode,
much more than a rational mode.
- One of my favorite things that I've seen,
it's not the, it's very naive,
it's not the best graffiti I've ever seen,
but I love the message
and it's a girl called Shamsia Hassanni,
she's an Afghan girl, she's 25 years old, lives in Kabul.
She's a lecturer at the university
which shows how fucked up it is
when you have a 25 year old lecturer
'cause there's no one else left.
But she's gone out and she's painting,
it's a girl in a blue burka that she paints.
And she paints it all over Kabul.
And you look at it and you go
that is one of the most politically charged images
that you could possibly have.
It means one thing in the west,
means another thing in the east.
She's going out, she's puttin' this thing out.
She's putting her life on the line
every time she does it.
- I was diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder
when I came back, and
that probably had an impact too
in terms of the direction I took
and also being critical about what was going on.
- Those kind of things, that's what gets me excited
when people are trying to use the medium to say something.
Like I said, I don't mind people
doing purely decorative stuff,
but I do like the stuff that has a message in it
and I think, you know,
the general public also like it.
Again, to use Banksy as an example,
his is a very naive political message.
As his girlfriend used to say,
it's like sick foreign politics.
But it was something that resonated right away,
across the board; people liked the message.
Same with JR, same with Marcus.
If you look around, you'll probably find a handful,
they're actually trying to say something
on a political level.
I think, again, I think a lot of the artists
are put off by their galleries
for doing something that has too much of an edge to it
'cause it's slightly harder to sell.
- Everything in life somehow plays a part
in terms of decisions you make later.
I think all of it sort of came together in the arts
because it allowed me to explore that
and it gave me maybe some of the,
some of the motive on why I was doing what I was doing.
And I think that's probably one of the things
that brought my sort of awareness about being
or using your instincts for your benefit,
which again, like I said before,
we don't really use as much in a civilized society
because we're constantly following orders and rules.
So maybe it's that that sort of ignited that whole idea.
And obviously some of it worked its way into my work
in terms of looking at that information
and that experience as critical.
- And I suppose that's the other thing
that separates Marcus, in a sense,
from the previous generations of abstract expressionists,
because painting is something which really hangs on
in American art production
because of New York and because of the way
that New York took over from Paris,
and the influence of it
in a way I don't think it really hangs on in other cultures.
And I think that my first impressions of his work were,
they were unweighted, in a sense,
and I say that there was a lot of iconography,
a lot of popular iconography involved in it;
the Dorothy characters,
but also there's McDonald characters, things like that,
the prevalence of a certain grammar of symbols
which exist in the work, these targets which reappear,
the use of found material
which become symbolic material to a certain degree.
And I think that the emphasis for the gallery owner
was a sense on the more saleable pieces
which would be the wall-based works.
So paintings are much easier to sell than installations.
- That's the pleasure we have of looking at art,
is that it's the one free aspect that we have
that's not touchable.
- In some ways, seeing like the way he works in the studio,
it's a lot of shop talk kind of stuff how things are
and
I picked up that he's somebody that's been in the trenches
doing what he does,
and it's kind of nice because
there's murals on the trench walls,
he's
honing in
and he's focusing on
the nature of the materials
and the way that they're speaking to him.
I'm much more interested
in what I feel about a subject than
what I see in a subject.
It's the feeling that I get that interests me.
That's what we want to convey.
Instinctive feeling.
- And he's working on mastering the way they speak to him.
- You never know when you're done.
You just stop in a moment of time, you know.
Any painting can continue, it's just a matter of,
a painting is simply capturing a moment in time.
You can always continue a painting
'cause you can always go over it or, you know,
find a way to sort of continue it.
It's a matter of capturing one moment of many moments
that you already experienced in the process of painting,
in the process of putting it together.
- This knowing other painters, how they deal with the chaos
and the confusion and then finding
the answers in the confusion, I like that he works,
he talks about, "I don't know, I just get into it
"and then it kind of comes into being,"
rather than controlling it to be exactly
and which is like a Rauschenbergian thing.
Bob would say, "If I know what it looks like, why do it?"
- The work of his that I was really fascinated with,
the first work I was fascinated with,
was something called Rock-a-bye Baby
and it's a floor-based work, basically.
It could be hung on a wall, if you had a lot of anchors.
But it's a floor-based work which has a small
figure of a black baby in the middle of it
with no painted on its forehead
and a landscape around it which
is basically with found studio material, and then things
like jigsaw puzzle pieces, a lot of brushes, other things.
And discussing this with Marcus
I thought was very interesting
because there is a very fascinating discourse in,
you consider art history or art theory
that was mainly pioneered by WJT Mitchell,
who's a critic out of Chicago, and it's basically talking
about colonial ideas of landscape
and how landscape, as a genre,
can also be considered a medium,
in other words, it's a medium to convey power
or a medium to communicate power.
And usually you're thinking of Gainsborough
when you think of this,
you're thinking of these English landscapes
from base of the 18th century,
where you start having an empire,
in which you have the landowner
and maybe the landowner's wife
with this perfect, idyllic setting,
which they, in a sense, are the purveyors of.
They're evidencing their wealth.
And you can go on to people who did landscapes of India
for an entire career, but they spent one day in India
and India looks a lot like Dorset
for the rest of their career,
but it's supposed to be India.
No comments yet. Be the first to leave one.