Woman with a Suitcase (캐리어를 끄는 여자)

Defense, I understand this is your first trial. But we don't have much time...

there's no need for you to read all that to us.

I'm sure the prosecution has confirmed that as well.

You should stop.

I believe the prosecution doesn't know about this.

The fact that a page out of the reference material was missing.

There's this thing called Tunnel Vision.

Once they find an evidence that directs the defendant to be found guilty...

the Prosecution only looks at that alone.

It's a phenomenon that shows that they don't look at anything else.

The prosecution is committing the error of tunnel vision right now.

Since the coroner's death, the defense has requested the prosecution...

of the issue behind the problematic document.

Whether it's intentional or a mistake... just like this...

they sent us a document that was missing a page like this.

It just means they only see what they want to see.

What should I do?

Let her drive her point to the foreign substance.

By chance, do you remember how many pages there were in the report, Witness?

Do you remember?

Do you remember?

Then, I'll ask you another way.

By chance, was there...

anything unusual while you were performing the autopsy with Coroner Park Ji Seok?

I think there was a page on a foreign substance.

When you say "foreign substance," what do you mean by that?

There was a small plastic wrapper inside her stomach.

I believe Coroner Park recorded it separately.

Since we don't know the prosecution's intentions,

the defense attempted to confirm the original autopsy report

by reaching out to National Forensic Services, but...

since the coroner's death, we couldn't locate the original.

We received a vague answer asking us to request it

through the Prosecutor's Office.

The prosecution must address the problem with the attached information...

You must explain it without a trace of doubt.

She's got it. She did it.

Our Golden Tree is standing tall.

That's all.

Today, the first day of trial on Seo Ji Ah's murder case took place in the courthouse.

The prosecution insists on the possibility of Mr. Ham committing the crime.

But Mr. Ham's defense attorney is insisting on his innocence.

Currently, over six hours of interrogation is taking place.

His defense attorney Cha Geum Joo...

Recent death of Coroner Park Ji Seok of National Forensic Service...

Cha Geum Joo...

You should take it easy...

Good thinking. You made a good choice.

Request submission for an additional witness.

What should I do?

How about if you ask them to explain by the next trial date?

The question brought up by the defense...

We believe it's a crucial element of doubt. Prosecution...

by next trial date...

submit the original autopsy report compiled by Park Ji Seok.

We won't need to postpone that to our next trial date. About this reasonable doubt...

The prosecution has discovered a very important fact during our investigation...

We request an additional witness.

An important fact?

Objection. We cannot not allow an additional witness

who was not previously submitted to testify.

This is not only relevant to Coroner Park Ji Seok's death, but...

it's relevant to the doubt the defense has raised about

the autopsy report. She's a crucial witness to that.

Prosecution, please proceed.

That Attorney Park... to the end...

Perhaps?... There's no way...

Witness, do you have testimony regarding

the additional report to the controversial autopsy report?

Yes.

Did the deceased Coroner Park Ji Seok meet with you

before he died to discuss Seo Ji Ah's case with you?

Yes.

What did the deceased Park Ji Seok tell you?

Now, I'll ask you again. What did he say?

Inside the victim Seo Ji Ah's stomach...

he said he found a foreign substance that appeared to be a plastic wrapper.

Your testimony matches the previous researcher's testimony.

By chance, could you tell us in detail about that foreign substance?

A plastic wrapper that appeared to be a candy wrapper...

as if she wanted to identify the killer...

there was a writing on it.

Writing? What kind of writing?

Hamburger.

Could you please say that once more?

It said, "Hamburger."

What do you think she meant by "Hamburger?"

Now, what does that mean?

Did she mean fast food?

It's a nickname of someone I know of.

The defense lawyer Cha Geum Joo...

is well aware of this term of endearment.

It's defendant Ham Bok Geo's nickname.

Synced & ripped by bozxphd Subtitles by The Feisty Team @ Viki

Woman With a Suitcase

Episode 13 Putting the defendant's benefit first

We, the prosecution, believe the Coroner Park Ji Seok's death

was relevant to this case. He was pressured because of this case

and we suspect that he might've decided to sacrifice himself for the sake of his family.

We believe that the defendant brought about his death.

Thus, we believe that his death should be investigated separately or together

with this case.

Objection.

You're trying to determine the defendant as the murderer of this

case based on the witness that was called out at the last minute.

Your attempt is unjustifiable.

Even if the defendant and his defense acknowledge the fact

that "Hamburger" is indeed their term of endearment...

unless we confirm the controversial report on the

foreign substance ourselves, we don't believe

the witness testimony can be served as crucial evidence.

There is no actual evidence that proves that the defendant killed Seo Ji Ah.

All the evidence that was submitted by the prosecution

are not sufficient enough to prove his guilt.

They're indirect evidence.

To accept the crime in a court of criminal justice,

there has to be firm evidence beyond any reasonable doubt.

It must be firm and clear evidence.

To look out for the best interest of the defendant...

Even if there may be a shadow of guilt, if crucial evidence does not present itself...

we must follow the principal that the best

interest of the defendant should be considered.

Your Honor, please only consider firm evidence

and determine the defendant's guilt.

To provide the evidence the defense so insists on...

an eyewitness...

I call Alan Baston to the stand.

Witness, you're a foreigner who is residing in Korea.

What is your occupation?

I'm a priest.

Where do you live right now?

I'm staying at a residential hotel near Han River Park.

You found out about the defendant's trial while watching the news on TV

and came to the Prosecutor's Office saying you want to testify. Is that correct?

Yes, that's correct.

These are photos of you that were taken at the park.

Do you know when those photos were taken?

Je ne sais pas.

Excuse me?

I'm sorry. I started speaking French all of a sudden. No, I didn't know.

But I do go there quite often to exercise.

Now, if we check the date, two and three days before the incident...

it's seen that you were exercising at the park.

Do you usually exercise at that time?

I normally exercise around 6 a.m. to 7 a.m. But that day, something came up...

I believe I left when it was still dark.

By chance, did you happen to see the defendant around

5 a.m., which is around the time of the incident?

Oui... ah, yes, I did.

How did you happen to remember the defendant in particular in a public place?

I did borrow some water from the defendant before.

So, I wanted to say hello.

But the defendant's facial expression looked way too serious. So, I let him go.

Excuse me, I think my dog is thirsty.

Can he have a sip of water?

If that's the case, would you explain what you mean by "serious?"

He looked very angry.

How should I explain it... as if he could kill someone?

That's the guy. They stood the real culprit to this incident...

on the witness stand.

I lifted my arm, but he still didn't recognize me.

- And the incident occurred... - CEO Lee Dong Soo...

He wants to finish up the trial today like this.

It's not a bad idea.

Since that guy presented himself to us, we might as well...

wrap up the homeless girl incident.

Since he looked so nice, I was hoping to become a drinking buddy in Korea.

Honestly, I'm very shocked.

Now, if you see that angry man, please point him out.

The man sitting at the defendant seat is the one you saw at 5 a.m...

Are you saying he's the one?

Yes, I believe so.

Witness, please answer either yes or no.

Oui, I mean... yes, he's the one.

Do you happen to remember the clothes the defendant was wearing?

He was wearing a black jacket and inside that, he was wearing a beige shirt.

Witness, you're testifying about the most crucial element in this trial.

Please keep that in mind. Now, I'll ask you.

The shirt the defendant was wearing that day...

is this the one?

Yes, I think so.

By chance, is that a Brunello shirt? I personally like Italian shirts.

I think that's the one.

Let's go.

Just a moment.

You did very good.

I couldn't turn his testimony around.

If they get so offensive like that, there's not much Golden Tree can do.

More importantly... that guy earlier...

As I've told you, he's a real professional.

So, be careful.

That's what I worry about more.

Attorney Cha, you were very cool.

Let's go.

What do we do with that guy?

You did good. It was just the first day. Don't worry too much.

Gosh, seriously. We should take out all those morons who commit perjury.

What's with Attorney Park?

Attorney Park has crossed the river she can't return.

Good job, Attorney Park.