Who Killed John O'Neill?

On July 3rd, 1979, the CIA gave birth to Islamic fundamentalism

when President Carter signed a directive

for United States intelligence to provide radical Islamic thinking

and arms to Afghan fighters, before the Soviet Union invaded.

This is documented in a 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski,

Carter's National Security Advisor.

Who killed John O'Neill?

I don't sleep.

I don't eat.

I don't shower. I don't shave.

I don't see anybody. I don't talk to anybody.

I can't remember the last time I spoke to anyone or even left my apartment.

I don't do anything but think.

I KNOW they did it.

I want to prove it.

I have to prove it. Prove what?

I HAVE to prove it. Prove WHAT?

I must. I have to. Should I?

The Council on Foreign Relations.

The Trilateral Commission. The Bilderberg Group.

Bush family. CIA, Kissinger, Brzezinski... Everybody.

Everybody's in on it. EVERYBODY.

Figure out the puzzle.

The Council on Foreign Relations has controlled the world for 50 years.

You can go on their website and read about it.

Am I the only person who feels the need to know more?

I am afraid this obsession will be all for naught.

But I am more afraid of being like everyone else.

I am more afraid of being complacent.

After 9-11, I was like everyone else.

I was a flag-waving patriot. I thought al Qaeda did it, too.

I thought we should bomb the Arabs straight back to the stone age, just like everyone else did.

Bomb them straight to hell.

Then I read about John O'Neill.

Maverick counter-terrorism expert in the FBI.

O'Neill tracked Osama bin Laden since 1995.

He knew more about Osama than anyone in the world.

He tracked him past the Embassy bombings in 1998 and the Cole bombing in 2000.

He knew more about Osama and al Qaeda than anyone in the world.

Isn't that interesting.

Then O'Neill got in some trouble.

His investigation into terrorism were blocked from up on high.

Blocked by whom?

In the summer of 2001, he resigned as Deputy Director of the FBI.

At the same time, he was publicly opposed to the anti-terrorism policies of President George W. Bush.

On September 10th, 2001, he started his new job,

with a company called Kroll Associates...

As head of security at the World Trade Center.

A day later, he was dead.

A victim of the September 11th terrorist attacks.

He died at the World Trade Center. Come on!

The FBI's top counter-terrorism expert,

who after chasing bin Laden for six years happened to take a job in the private sector,

is murdered in an internationally-televised terrorist attack blamed on his arch nemesis?

Killed by his arch nemesis. How ironic.

Coincidence? Fate?

Or conspiracy?

Conspiracy!

Why did O'Neill start working at the Trade Center?

Why were his investigations into al Qaeda stopped?

Who arranged for him to get his new, ill-fated job?

I know the answers to these questions now.

And none of them have to do with Osama bin Laden.

The more you look at the whole, and not just the pieces...

You don't know anything -

...the more you understand what really happened.

John O'Neill is the key. Look into John O'Neill.

Kroll Associates, Brian Jenkins, Jerome Hauer.

Look for John O'Neill. He is the key.

Michael Cherkasky, ever looked into the LAPD?

Why don't you go back to the FBI, Robert Mueller?

John O'Neill's investigations through the New York City offices of the FBI...

...were run in concert with the CIA.

The offices were in World Trade Center building number 7.

World Trade Center building number 7. Floors 23 through 26...

were the federal bunker offices...

of all the federal agencies in New York City.

Set up...

...by Jerome Hauer.

Jerome Hauer was the guy who got John O'Neill his job at the World Trade Center.

Who killed John O'Neill?

And why?

That's a very good question.

So who did kill John O'Neill?

To understand what happened to John O'Neill

you have to know what happened on 9/11.

I am prepared to listen.

Are you sure?

I am sure.

The CIA created Islamic Fundamentalism in 1979.

It was a way to draw the Soviet Union into a war with Afghanistan.

It gave the Soviets their Vietnam War.

It destroyed their economy and dispelled support of Communism.

It was a smart thing to do, wasn't it?

Not without a price.

During the war, the US, UK, and Pakistan all supported and groups of Arab fighters

known as the 'Mujahedeen'.

Two of these freedom-fighters were Ramzi Yousef,

and Osama bin Laden.

Books printed by the University of Nebraska

and paid for by the U.S. Department of Education

taught the Mujahedeen radical theories of Islam

and treated them to math problems and literature exercises riddled with allusions to

guns, bombs, tanks...

Just overall, general killing. You know, they...

They trained them to be violent,

and then they wonder why they became terrorists.

It would seem that creating a radical branch of Islam pales in comparison to ending the Cold War.

It would seem that way... yes.

But after the Soviets withdrew, the Mujahedeen were left without political support

in a war-torn, impoverished, and socially unstable nation-state.

So they started a second resistance movement -

this time aimed toward the United States.

And the primary group formed at this time, in the late eighties....

was al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda was an intelligence operation from the start... straight up to now.

That's a very dangerous thing to say.

Even though it's true.

From its inception, Al Qaeda was trained, funded, armed, and supported

by the Pakistani intelligence agency,

the ISI.

The ISI, by its own disclosure, is an arm of the American CIA.

That's a very ominous association in light of what happened on 9-11.

It's not the first time it came back to bite us in the ass.

Iran-Contra? Sandinistas in Nicaragua?

There are plenty of others that haven't been as widely reported.

And Iran Contra's not a far cry from the CIA's involvement with Al Qaeda.

You're right.

Iran-Contra channeled money to states already considered terrorist-nations,

like Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Lebanon.

And as the other half of the handshake,

trillions of dollars in illegal narcotics have made their way into this country,

from the Middle East, the Far East and Latin America.

It shows a pattern of fraud and complicity by the U.S. Government

to promote instability abroad, to further their domestic agenda.

And it goes a long way to explain it's governance of the ISI and Al Qaeda.

It is frightening how tightly the ISI and al Qaeda fit together. Isn't it?

It's more frightening how often the mainstream media typically ignore it.

The media seemed too busy trying to scare us all into submission.

By aiding the government in covering up the truth

and thereby giving credence to the bogus official story.

Where's the ISI in the official story?

The official story of 9-11 implicates a man named Omar Shiekh Saeed

as the paymaster for lead hijacker Mohammed Atta,

and a man named Khalid Shaikh Muhammad as the operational mastermind behind the attacks.

Both men are well-known ISI agents.

How do I know the name Saeed?

Probably because he is one of the most infamous terrorists known to man.

You may know him by another name, too, because he has about a half-dozen aliases.

His big claim to fame is his conviction for the

kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in February of 2002.

Daniel Pearl was killed by an ISI agent?

By the very man the government claims assisted in the 9-11 attacks.

Pearl was on his way to meet with Saeed when he disappeared.

Saeed, using one of his aliases,

knew that Pearl was investigating ISI ties to al Qaeda and 9-11.

I thought Pearl was killed because he was Jewish.

But it's far more likely he was killed

by a high-ranking ISI-agent to make sure he didn't print in a major U.S. newspaper

ISI's connection to al Qaeda.

Because that, in turn, would implicate the CIA.

Well, think about it.

If al Qaeda is funded by the ISI,

and the ISI is funded by the CIA...

two plus two equals four.

What I am saying is,

even though it's virtually impossible to believe the official story of 9-11,

on the off-chance it is true,

the CIA - and therefore this government - is guilty of negligence

for continuing to function as a liaison between Pakistan and Al Qaeda.

So no matter what happened -

if it was them, if it was us, if it was anybody -

the CIA is guilty anyway?

It sounds like you just want the CIA to be guilty.

He's on to us. He's CIA. Get off the phone.

You are putting this whole thing in jeopardy.

You are talking on an open line, to someone you don't know and you are telling him everything.

Put it in your head. Keep it in your head. Right up here. Just talk to me. Don't talk to him. Talk to me. Sound good?

What are you doing here?

I am here to keep you from making a huge mistake!

Ok? In a post-9/11 world, you cannot trust anybody!

Especially knowing what you and I know.

I understand that.

Hey, wait, no. You understand. Let's go pack a bag- Get your stuff -And let's get out of here.

We can still get out of here, if we do it now!

No, I am not going anywhere.

Ok, CIA hit squads. CIA hit squads are coming up the stairs.

Oh, there are plenty of people. AK-47's, and black vests. You know they are coming. Black helicopters outside.

Oh, they're coming, they are going to take us to an underground bunker somewhere,

and tie car batteries to our nuts.

There is no one coming up here!

Oh God, oh God...

I told you. I told you you were going to get us killed, and now you did it! Now you did it!

Shut up. Shut up!

Oh, look at the birds. Oh, there's a conch shell.

If I put it up to my ear, I can hear the ocean.

Open up, you are under arrest.

Under arrest for what?

Yeah, yeah, be firm with the CIA...

For wasting your life with these conspiracy theories