The first 200 lines.
Just take a look at the number of people that have been living
on planet Earth
We start about 10.000 years ago
At that point there were roughly five million people
living on the planet,
and they slowly increased in number
for some considerable time, up until we get to 1800
Well, then we get one billion people on the planet
And by the time we get to 1960, we get three billion
And then things go wild and it escalates massively
up here, to the 7.7 billion people
that we've got on planet Earth right now
The UN predicts that by 2050
there'll be almost ten billion humans on planet Earth
We all know about the pressures our planet is under from climate change
We exist because of nature,
and that nature is really falling apart
But I believe we're facing another challenge
which is just as fundamental
Within the last six generations
we've gone through the biggest population explosion of our species
I'm going on a personal journey around the world to find out
what effect our growing population is having on the planet right now
This is Earth, vast consumption
We honestly think that we can carry on doing this?
And to find out if there's any limit to the number
of people our Earth can sustain
Things are probably going to get fairly uncomfortable and pretty ugly
before we fix it, aren't they?
I think there are systems in place
I just think we've rather lost the plot
If, as I believe, our ever increasing numbers
may in fact be a threat to our own survival,
could we find a way, as a species
to reduce our own population?
Someone's got to talk about this issue
whilst there's still some chance that we can solve the problem
Hey, come on
Yeah, let's go Come on, hurry up
All right, come on, come on, come on
I live on my own in the middle of the woods with my dogs
Scratchy fell down the stairs a couple of days ago
and I've been told that I mustn't appease his limp or carry him
or anything like that
Come on, Scratch
Ever since I can remember, I've dedicated my life to one thing
I have a profound love for every last thing that
slimes, creeps, crawls, stings, bites and slithers
I fight really hard against injustices
that are wrought upon the natural world
They're incendiary to me
I'm a patron of a charity that campaigns to achieve
a sustainable human population
If I'm very honest with you, most of the time I don't hold the human
species in terribly high regard because of the enormous damage
that it's done to the natural environment
and it's still doing to it
But at the same time, I am a human and there are lots of humans
that I have an enormous admiration for
When you think about what we're capable of in terms of art,
music, technology, we are remarkably adaptable,
resourceful and intelligent
Nothing else comes close to us
But there are 7.7 billion humans on the planet at the moment
So what's the impact of that?
Is that a sustainable number of people?
Or do we need to be considering how we adapt our behaviour
to make that sustainable, or even going as far as to stopping
the population growing much more?
And there, I've said it
That's the controversy, isn't it?
For me, it's been THE most important thing
to think about for a long time
It is undeniably the elephant in the room
So how did we get to 7.7 billion in the first place?
And what's going to happen if by 2050
there were ten billion humans on planet Earth?
One of the biggest changes that's occurred in my lifetime
is the sheer number of people living in urban centres
There are now more than 30 so-called mega cities in the world
with ten million people or more,
not just New York, Shanghai and Tokyo,
but also Kinshasa, Lima, Mumbai
Such concentrations of people places a major pressure on resources
We definitely are at a turning point, a tipping point
and I think all sorts of factors are coming together
We have obviously huge climate change issues,
environmental resource issues
And I think the next two or three decades,
yes, are going to be crucial
Look at it, just endless sprawl to the horizon
I'm starting my journey in one of the world's
most populated megacities
Land, a carpet of concrete blocks
filled full of millions and millions and millions of people
In 1960, Sao Paolo was home to roughly four million people
Today, as the city's grown, it's more like 22 million
You can see here on the right side how many buildings we have
It's the financial capital of Brazil and one of South America's most
important economic and cultural centres, a bit like London
only five times the size
These mega cities, you think of the impact and the consumption,
the hunger and the thirst and the dependent need
of all of these people living in one place at one time
The prediction is that by 2050, nearly 70% of the human population
are going to be living in these areas
What's going to be the impact of that?
Cities are associated with higher levels of consumption
because they have higher levels of productivity
than rural areas
And it's very clear that the richer .. countries actually have
.. levels of consumption that really outweigh everything
that the planet can sustain
But on the other hand, the cities themselves have the potential
to make that consumption more efficient
Although Sao Paulo's levels of consumption aren't as high
as some places in the world, the traffic here is so notorious
that the city's wealthy businesspeople
often get around by helicopter
But Sao Paolo has a more fundamental problem
it's running out of water
Starting in 2014, reservoirs almost ran dry
as the city suffered one of its worst droughts since records began
Now, some residents are taking matters into their own hands
Hello, Hola, Chris
How do you do? How do you do?
Is that a purifier? Purifier, yes, it is
And does all of the water here need to be purified?
You can't trust it out the tap, no? No, we can't
We can't trust the water that comes from the pipe
You have a family
Many parents worry about whether their children will go out
and get an adequate education or whether they will find employment
and some sense of fulfilment and contentment in their life,
but here in Sao Paulo, you've got to hope that your kids
are going to grow up and be able to get a drink of water,
which is fundamentally different
That must be a real concern to you
Yes, it is Yes, it is
The population will be bigger
in some years with the same amount of water
So the problem, er, will be worst
in a few years, in a short period of time
So, It's not good?
No, no, it's terrifying
It's terrifying
Maria and her neighbours are paying to secure their own private water
source, drawn directly from the ground outside their block
Hola, Hola
Chris, Chris, Emerson, Emerson
Are you well? Yes, Good, good
It's a bit like Texas, when they were digging oil wells everywhere
in that mad rush for the oil
And now it's not the oil business, it's the water business
it's a water boom
Across Sao Paolo, over 13000 private wells have already been dug
But with the poorest parts of the city often suffering the most
from the droughts, protests have erupted in the streets
Unless you reduce consumption, the original aquifers
the original source of water is going to run dry
Climate change doesn't help
You know, in some regions, rain is becoming more and more scarce
It is a major, major problem of mixture of climate change
and individual consumption levels
In Sao Paulo, they're digging their own wells
We've already seen water riots where people without water
are clearly upset with this disparity, Yes
When the fundamentals of life, like water, are decided
by whether you're rich or poor,
that's not going to be sustainable, is it? I agree
The trouble is, we don't have control over climate change
So the minute the rivers dry up or there's, there's a drought
that lasts for years, then you have to resort to major measures
like desalination, like bringing water even further out,
as Los Angeles does
Los Angeles brings in water from hundreds of kilometres away
And therefore, there's an issue of justice
You're depriving local people from the water that is theirs
in a region because you're feeding this large city
So it's a very difficult problem
All over the planet, cities like Los Angeles, Cape Town
and even Tokyo have faced severe water problems
And it's predicted that within 25 years, London could be next
Erm, Wow, it's very impressive
We're monitoring here, all Brazil
In Sao Paolo, the droughts have become so serious that a team
of government scientists now continuously monitor rainfall
This is fabulous, isn't it?
I love data, and this is real time data on a continental scale, Yeah
But this presumably is also the interface
where you look at a shortage of rain
This is for the short term rainfall
But, for example, for drought, we use this for infrastructure also
So this is effectively the emergency room
Yes, we now have a mapping for all Brazil
to see where regions of Brazil
are suffering with droughts
For the drought, we are concerning about this region
and the north-east The north-east too?
Yes, north-east too
No comments yet. Be the first to leave one.