The first 200 lines.
I dunno, that's a good question, who would be,
what would the general populous be more skeptical of,
Bigfoot or aliens?
If I ever get abducted by aliens,
I'm gonna ask them what's the deal with Bigfoot?
Careful now, Bigfoot, no question,
but I'm definitely more
tailored to the fascinated by Ufology.
There is something that those people are drawn to.
I love exploring that plane,
its color,
its
joy
its mystery and living in that mystery.
I really think that it's okay
that people go out in search for these things
and wanna know more about life beyond where we are.
There's something there.
I really think people who go in search of Bigfoot
and I think people who go in search of aliens
I think they're very similar and here's why.
A lot of people who studied
and there are people who take just simply
a scholarly academic approach to the study of the unknown,
and that's what science is all about.
If you have a question that you don't know the answer to,
you have a hypothesis,
you test that hypothesis with evidence
and if your hypothesis proves to be untrue,
you come back and you re-hypothesis.
It was "Harry and the Hendersons"
the movie "Harry and the Hendersons"
that really sparked my interest in Bigfoot
and similarly to "E.T."
which sparked my interest in extra terrestrials, right,
there was this infusion of love,
of tenderness, of kindness in both of those films
and so, from the earliest age my interest
in anything paranormal, extra terrestrial in origin
was grounded in this idea that
perhaps there are species out there
yet undiscovered or proven to exist in the mainstream
that
are not caged and restricted
by the same kind of shortcomings that human beings have.
The biggest difference between cryptozoology and Ufology
whether it's doing research,
speaking at conferences, lectures, TV shows,
things like that,
the biggest difference is that a lot of UFO research
is sort of historical going through files,
speaking with witnesses.
Cryptozoology, because it's the study of unknown animals,
there's a great deal of research done out in the field
in forests, in woods, in lakes, mountains,
So, cryptozoology lends it more to
expeditions and being on the road
whereas Ufology is scrutinizing cases
and documents and files.
So, one is very much outdoors, another one is
pouring over material, that kind of thing.
So, there's definitely a little bit of a difference
I think, between the UFO and Bigfoot community.
Bigfoot community tends to be a little more grounded,
a lot of these guys,
there's just guys only about in the woods,
they're pretty down to earth
and they know the animals, they know their species,
you know, they just either I've had when
I've seen something unusual they can't explain, you know,
they don't think of it in terms of
I think so much in terms of like anthropology or biology,
a lot of these guys 'cause these guys,
some of these guys are hunters or they're just
guys that live out in the woods
and they're pretty regular people.
It doesn't attract as many crazy people to
or let's say delusional, to be honest, you know,
as the UFO field does and it's not as,
there's less politics.
I think especially today,
the UFO field is very politically motivated,
you know, everything,
it's been hijacked a little bit by
some group of people that
where the UFOs are coming second behind
the worship of certain politicians or,
you know, it gets tied up with like a QAnon phenomena
which I personally think is utterly ridiculous.
So, there's a lot more conspiracy theories out there
that I think are kind of going off the deep end
and then attracts a lot of those guys.
Yeah, it's interesting 'cause
there is not much cultural crossover between the alien fans,
the ancient alien fans,
the conspiracy theorists about governments and
stuff like that,
the Bigfoot people, the ghost people
and there really should because
basically we're all the same in the sense,
if you put us all together,
you'd have a really, really massive block
of voters and political activists because
we're all people that recognize in one way or another
that the world that we're presented on TV is not reality,
that there is a much deeper, maybe darker,
but certainly more interesting reality that we exist in
than what we're sold every day.
There's a lot more things going on than just
who's gonna win the Super Bowl?
The Chiefs by the way.
You know, there's more stuff going on than that
and the, you know,
the impeachment farce that's going on right now,
it's all for show and it's all to keep us distracted
from the ghosts and the Bigfoots
and the things that don't fit
and the aliens and the ancient aliens,
just to keep us from really focusing on the truth
because if we did focus on that, we might get distracted
and not really think it was that important
to go to work tomorrow
and that's what keeps the engine of civilization running.
We had a fascinating conversation with Mike Bara
on the way up the mountain.
He was tired, this is before this whole
virus thing came out and he started,
he was saying that, yeah, I got an insider CIA guy that
has said that we have a virus
that targets certain ethnic groups
and the whole, everybody in the truck we're just like,
what are you talking about?
And it's right as the whole thing was gonna breaking free
but it doesn't look like that was the,
it just started in China or whatever, but it was,
that's, you know, you get all kinds of insider info
from these guys and then
when they say they got a contact,
it's hard not to, you know.
I really think that it's okay
that people go out in search for these things
and wanna know more about space
and wanna know more about life beyond where we are.
We have predilections to violence,
to disorder,
vengeance, anger, hatred, all these things and
when I saw those movies when I was a child,
I thought, what if there really is a species out there that
was kind and compassionate and they
were not a species of of war or conflict?
There are scientific species, right?
Like "E.T." the extra terrestrial
or "Harry and the Hendersons"
that maybe all these setting's a Bigfoot which
keep their distance for the most part,
Sasquatch or Yeti.
That they're intelligent enough to stay away from us
because maybe
they don't wanna get involved with our conflicts
and they can see how aggressive we can be,
not that we always are,
but we have people out there that are actually
with guns hunting for Bigfoot
which I just think is absolutely absurd
and I highly, highly condemn it.
It really just ticks me off that people would do that
because there's just not enough good evidence
that I've seen, that Bigfoot or Sasquatch is
aggressive and violent towards human beings.
They may be at times confrontational
in that they approach and come close to us, to eyewitnesses,
but that does not justify
looking for a trophy just to prove that some species exists,
because again, for me,
it's something more meta, it's bigger.
The search for strange creatures or
extraterrestrials visiting here,
whatever you're searching for, for me it all means
something much bigger than ourselves.
For me, that's one of the main reasons why
I kind of, like cryptozoology in many ways more than Ufology
because I enjoy the sort of
road trip expedition aspect of it,
hitting the road and potentially, you know,
staking out to the Lake
where something has been seen for seven days.
You know, for me, that's more exciting than just
pouring over something
that's been released on the Freedom of Information Act
from 50 years ago, which is really still cool material
but I kind of liked that sort of
pitching the road angle more than anything else, yeah.
Personally, I think both
UFO's and Bigfoot are equally believable
but for different reasons.
I think because the UFO phenomena, we have so much
evidence now, I don't wanna say proof
'cause we don't have the smoking gun, you know,
but obviously recently we've seen
various governments including ours
No comments yet. Be the first to leave one.